I. Overview
The purpose of this
material is to provide the special education administrator with an
understanding of the "Administrative Simplification" standards
adopted by Health and Human Services under the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). This material is not
intended to substitute for legal counsel nor is it intended to provide
an exhaustive statement of the legal requirements imposed by the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Return
to Table of Contents
II. The HIPAA
Privacy Rule
The Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (enacted on August 21, 1996)
required the Secretary of Health and Human Services to publicize
standards for the electronic exchange, privacy and security of health
information. These requirements were euphemistically known as the
"Administrative Simplification" provisions. The Act provided
that if Congress did not enact privacy legislation within three years of
its passage, the Secretary was required to issue privacy regulations
governing individually identifiable health information.
Congress did not enact
privacy legislation and thus, Health and Human Services developed a
proposed rule which it first released for public comment in November of
1999. The proposed privacy rule went through an initial public comment
phase which resulted in the publication of a final regulation on
December 28, 2000. In March of 2002, the Department proposed and
released for public comment modifications to the privacy rule and after
comment, the final modifications were published on August 14, 2002. See
45 CFR Part 160 and Part 164 (subparts a and e).
Return
to Table of Contents
III. What Are The
Goals of HIPAA?
The privacy rule addresses
the use and disclosure of individuals "protected health
information" (PHI) by organizations subject to the privacy rule. In
addition, HIPAA sets standards for the individuals' privacy right to
understand and control how their health information is used.
A major goal of the
privacy rule is to ensure that personal health information is properly
protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to
provide and promote high quality health care and to protect the public's
health and well being. The Act's goal is to balance the use of health
information while protecting the privacy of people who seek medical
treatment. One of the underlying goals behind the privacy rule is to
frustrate the ability of health insurance companies to deny coverage
based on readily accessible medical information. Simply put, the privacy
rule insulates individuals from the risk that their personal health
information will be inappropriately accessed, released or misused.
Return
to Table of Contents
IV. When Might a
School District Be a "Covered Entity?"
School districts have
operated for many years under the privacy law that was enacted in 1974
known as the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). FERPA
requires schools that receive federal funding to hold as confidential
the information in students' education records. With few exceptions,
this information can only be made available to the parents, students at
age 18 or to school staff who have a 'need to know' in order to provide
education.
As a general rule, HIPAA's
definition of protected health information excludes education records
protected by FERPA. This means the use and disclosure of education
records, as defined by FERPA is not subject to HIPAA regulations. A
student's IDEA related-services records are included in the definition
of 'educational records' and are covered under FERPA.
However, there are two
circumstances in which a school district may become subject as a
"covered entity," to HIPAA regulations:
- A school district must
comply with HIPAA if the district provides health insurance protection
for its employees through a self-insurance plan.
- A district may be a
"covered entity" under HIPAA if the school district
participates in a school based Medicaid program that seeks reimbursement
for related services to a special education student who is Medicaid
eligible and whose IEP describes the related services. HIPAA describes a
'covered entity' as a health care provider who transmits any health
information in electronic form in connection with a transaction covered
by 45 CFR 160.103. If the Medicaid reimbursement/billing information is
transmitted electronically, the district must comply with the
administrative burdens of the HIPAA privacy rule. This includes the
responsibility on the part of a district as a covered entity to
distribute a notice of privacy rights to the parents of students. One
way to do such is to include the privacy rights notice annually in the
student handbook.
Often the determination as
to whether or not a school district is a "covered entity," can
be a factually sensitive matter and therefore, may require advice from
your legal counsel.
Return
to Table of Contents
V. The FERPA
Exemption
Health information
contained within a student's educational records that are subject to the
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act ("FERPA") are exempt
from the requirements of HIPAA. See 24 CFR 164.501. The Office for Civil
Rights has observed that, "While we strongly believe every
individual should have the same level of privacy protection for his/her
individually identifiable health information, Congress did not provide
us with authority to disturb the scheme it had devised for records
maintained by educational institutions and agencies under FERPA. We do
not believe Congress intended to amend or preempt FERPA when it enacted
HIPAA." The term "educational records" includes
individually identifiable health information of students under the age
of 18 created by a school nurse in a primary or secondary school
receiving funds. In addition, medical records that are accepted from
FERPA's definition of "education records" under FERPA Section
99.3 are also exempted from coverage by HIPAA.
Return
to Table of Contents
VI. Obtaining
Medical Records
The HIPAA privacy
regulations have the greatest impact on the ability of school districts
to access medical care records. Special education administrators are
frequently encountering circumstances where health care providers are
rejecting a parentally signed release as being non-HIPAA compliant. The
end result is that school districts are best advised to alter their
release forms in order to ensure that they are HIPAA compliant. A sample
release form is attached as Appendix A. However, school districts are
well advised to have their own legal counsel review and counsel them on
the detail of their release.
Return
to Table of Contents
VII. Conclusion
As a general premise, when
it comes to student records, a school district need be concerned with
FERPA compliance, but usually will not need to worry about HIPAA
compliance.
However, districts are
advised to use HIPAA compliant releases in order to simplify obtaining
information from medical care providers.
Return
to Table of Contents